|
Tea Party Candidates Info
|
![]() |
|||
|
Rick Santorum - Candidate InformationHe is Catholic, and normally voted conservative in US Senate, especially on pro life, and was very supportive of the policies of President George Bush.
Endorsement of liberal Alan Spector. One of Bush’s best friends, Big Pharma, did everything it could to help him out. It poured in over 8 million dollars to the campaign coffers of those in close races and those it needs help from in the coming months. Big Pharma was particularly concerned about the election outcome, as its Bush-granted Medicare gravy train was at stake. Under the Part D arrangement no negotiation for drug prices to Medicare participants is allowed. This gives Big Pharma billions of dollars of inflated profits at American taxpayer expense. It has been well documented that Big Pharma bought this legislation in the first place, showing that politics in America is not a process for the people but a process for the elite. Many Democrats have threatened to reverse the Big Pharma windfall, while many Republicans like Orinn Hatch (R-UT) have sought to protect it. Rick Santorum http://www.newswithviews.com/Richards/byron14.htm Rick Santorum - Conservative Alternative?
To his credit, Rick Santorum has a mostly pro life and pro family
voting record. But recently received only a 78% conservative voting
record as US Senator.
Rating of a D, on illegal immigration from Numbers USA.
Santorum voted to raise the debt ceiling a half dozen times. In comparison to Mitt Romney and others, Santorum has been consistently more conservative than many of the candidates. Santorum has been a solid pro life Catholic on moral issues, but not as much on fiscal or Constitutional issues. Santorum has proposed a $250,000 cap on the amount victims of medical malpractice can sue their doctors for. Yet his wife sought twice that much from a chiropractor she said treated her negligently. "The court proceedings are a personal family matter," said Mr. Privacy Rights, in answer to queries from reporters.
Supports allowing President ability to wage war, without congressional approval. How about the Obama invasion of Libya without congressional approval. 7) "We have found weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, chemical weapons." -- Santorum in a June 21 press conference.
Rick Santorum - Who's the Most Anti-Reagan Candidate in 2012?Though he is a populist critic of Big Government, Santorum shows no interest in defining principled limits on political power. His first priority is to make government pro-family, not to make it small. He has no use for a constitutional (or, as far as one can tell, moral) right to privacy, which he regards as a "constitutional wrecking ball" that has become inimical to the very principle of the common good. Ditto for the notions of government neutrality and free expression. He does not support a ban on contraception, but he thinks the government has every right to impose one.The quarrel between virtue and freedom is an ancient and profound one. Santorum's suspicion of liberal individualism has a long pedigree and is not without support in American history. Adams, after all, favored sumptuary laws that would restrict conspicuous consumption in order to promote a virtuous frugality. And Santorum is right to observe that no healthy society is made up of people who view themselves as detached and unencumbered individuals.
"But to move from that sociological truism to the proposition that the family is the fundamental unit of political liberty," says Galston, "goes against the grain of two centuries of American political thought, as first articulated in the Declaration of Independence." With It Takes a Family , Rick Santorum has served notice. The bold new challenge to the Goldwater-Reagan tradition in American politics comes not from the Left, but from the Right.
An analysis of all of the candidates for president from the Tea Party perspective. The Tea Party Candidates for President
Mitt Romney - How LiberalMitt Romney or Obama, which is the most liberal? Based on Romney as Governor of Massachusetts, Mitt Romney was more liberal than Obama! Wow! How So?
Romney gave us Romney Care, which Obama care was patterned after. A
tie on that issue.
Pushing the abortion issue? Both Mitt and Obama governed aggressively
pushing the pro abortion agenda.
Raising Taxes. Romney did more to raise taxes in Mass than Obama has
done. Romney more liberal on that point.
More Mitt Documentation ; Mitt Romney http://notmittromney.com/press/coalition-of-conservatives-launches-not-mitt-romney-effort-in-early-states/ - Mitt Romney http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=56637 - Mitt Romney http://www.whichmitt.com/ Mitt Romney http://notmittromney.com/ between the lines Joseph Farah - - Don't be fooled by Romney By Joseph Farah Mitt Romney has one chance to become president of the United States. Because of his wealth and his political machine on the ground in early primary states, he has a chance to win the Iowa caucuses and the New Hampshire primary, picking up momentum that could ultimately deliver him the Republican nomination. Therefore, consider this an open letter to the good folks of Iowa and New Hampshire: Don't be fooled by this political chameleon, this charlatan, this pretender to the throne. He's as phony as a three-dollar campaign promise. Romney has tried to "re-invent" himself as a presidential candidate following his years as governor of Massachusetts. But when a politician has a record of governance by which to judge him, as Romney does, that should serve as the real test of values, beliefs and abilities – not empty words that actually contradict his actions. For instance, Romney today claims to be pro-life. Yet he ran for governor as a staunch supporter of abortion on demand. He claims today to be a supporter of traditional marriage and an opponent of same-sex marriage. Yet, as governor of Massachusetts, he did more than any other person alive in the United States to ensure same-sex marriage would be the law of the land in his state. How? When the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ordered the state Legislature to write a new law permitting same-sex marriages, Romney, the governor, the chief executive of the state's government, fell all over himself to do something that was not required of him – issuing homosexual marriage licenses. Not only did this action reveal his gutlessness and lack of knowledge of the separation of powers in our system of government, it also suggests he is merely masquerading as someone committed to defending marriage as an institution between one man and one woman. Then there is another key constitutional issue – a real litmus test for anyone who claims to support freedom. Today he claims to be a champion of the Second Amendment, a proud member of the National Rifle Association. Yet, he supported President Clinton's draconian 1994 gun ban, boasting to the Boston Herald: "That's not going to make me the hero of the NRA. I don't line up with a lot of special interest groups." More recently, just five years ago, as governor he signed into law what is described by some as one of the toughest assault-weapons laws in the country. Romney is one of those politicians – not unlike Hillary Rodham Clinton and her husband – who will do anything and say anything to get elected. That's what certain politicians believe is more important than principle – getting themselves elected. There's no question he's ambitious. But his ambition to become president is based on his ability to fool the electorate, particularly Republican voters, into believing he is something he is not. If President George W. Bush set back the Republican Party years, perhaps decades, a politician like Romney, an empty suit with lots of money and good looks, could prove to be the death of the GOP if he should ever be elected president. Today I pledge earnestly and without reservation that I will not vote for Romney under any circumstances, no matter who his opponent might be. That's how bad he is. That's how unacceptable he is as a presidential candidate. I strongly urge the American electorate, especially the key voters in New Hampshire and Iowa, to take that pledge with me. I know the pickings are slim among the leading Republican candidates for president. I know the best and most qualified men running – people like Tom Tancredo and Duncan Hunter – have not made significant showings in the polls. I know Rudy Giuliani and John McCain are both equally unacceptable as alternatives. New Hampshire voters and Iowa Republican activists have a special responsibility to make wise choices. Their decisions can have profound impact on the choices the rest of us have in 2008. Don't be fooled by Mitt Romney. Mitt Romney http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=56637 - Mitt Romney http://reason.com/archives/2011/10/19/mitt-romneys-lying-problem .
Mississippi Tea Party Candidates 2012 MSCheck back to get the 2012 Mississippi candidate recommendations.Lt. Governor Phil Bryant is our example of a conservative Mississippi Tea Party Candidate. Election candidates information. Mississippi primary is in August 2, 2011 Mississippi Voter Conservative Tea Party Election CandidateGovernor Phil Bryant (R)Lt. Governor (R) Tate Reeves (R) who is the current State Treasurer Agriculture Commissioner - State Treasurer Lee Yancey (R) - State Senator Baptist minister State Auditor Stacy Pickering (R) Attorney General Steve Simpson (R) Secretary of State (R) Southern District Transportation Commissioner - Tom King Southern District Public Service Commissioner - Travis Rose Check back for more updated recommendations for state wide and many local races.
Mississippi Lt. Governor CandidatesTate Reeves (R) - State Treasurer (Recommended Conservative)Mississippi Statewide Election CandidatesState TreasurerLynn Fitch (R) - Attorney Lucien Smith (R) - AttorneyLee Yancey (R) - State Senator and Baptist Minister (Recommended) Connie Moran (D) - Mayor of Ocean Springs
Rankin County Brice Wiggins, Mississippi Senate District 52 - co endorse Tommy Moffatt, Mississippi Senate District 52 - , co endorse
Chip Wood, Mississippi State House District 2 - Brad Mayo, Mississippi State House District 12 - Chris Brown, Mississippi State House District 20 - Ron Swindall, Mississippi State Representative, District 79. Taylorsville, MS Brian Aldridge, Mississippi State House District 17 - Jack Larmour, Mississippi State House District 39 - Jay Mathis, Carthage, House District 45, Rep. Jim Ellington, Raymond, House District 73. Greg Snowden, Mississippi State House District 83 - Rep. Gary Staples, Laurel, House District 88 Becky Currie, Mississippi State House District 92 - Rep. Harvey Fillingane, House District 101. Rep. Toby Barker, House District 102. John McCay, Mississippi State House District 118 - Charles Busby, Mississippi House District 111 - Dorothy Wilcox, Mississippi State House District 122 - Carolyn Crawford, Pass Christian, House District 121
Democrats have virtually conceded Mississippi state wide races to Republicans. No candidates for LT. governor from the Democrat Party. It is very important to vote in the August primary, and in the runoff, as well as in November.
Mississippi Tea Party Information Election 2012With Phil Bryant leading the conservative charge, Max Phillips is also a strong conservative for Agriculture Commissioner. Tea Party voters won't blindly rush to a self-described Tea Party candidate, but will rally behind those who have walked the Tea Party talk, said Whit Ayres, co-founder of Resurgent Republic, a group that promotes conservative free-market principles. Ayres governors who have balanced their budgets and cut spending could fare better with Tea Party voters than candidates who simply pushed for such initiatives in Washington. "You'd have to give the edge to any candidate who has a demonstrated record of accomplishment in statewide office," Ayres said.
Kentucky Tea Party Candidates 2012 KYCheck back fro the Kentucky 2012 recommendations.
Kentucky for the most conservative tea party candidates:
ATTORNEY GENERAL: Todd P'Pool (R) -
Secretary of State - Bill Johnson (R) - Recommended Agriculture Commissioner James Comer (R) - conservative State Auditor STATE TREASURER: K.C. Crosbie (R) Louisiana Tea Party Candidates 2012 LALouisiana tea party recommendations for 2012 Louisiana election candidates to be posted here.
Ivo "Trey" Roberts (D) - Tea Party Activist - the Conservative Choice Louisiana Tea Party Candidate Voter Election Information 2012Governor Bobby Jindal of Louisiana, has announced he is running for reelection. Bobby Jindial has been a moderate on the issues and has not pushed the conservative agenda, a RINO Republican.Ivo "Trey" Roberts (D) - Tea Party Activist - the Conservative Choice,
Lieutenant Governor Candidates: Louisiana Attorney General. James "Buddy" Caldwell is more conservative than challenger Ex-Congressman Joseph Cao (R) - Ex-Congressman even voted for Obama care. Louisiana Local Conservative CandidatesLarry LaBorde for Ouachita Parish sheriff (Recommended)Jay Morris, State Representative District 14, which is Northeast Louisiana near Monroe. (Recommended)
Tea Party Candidates MichiganMichigan will elect their tea party candidates in the Michigan Primary on August 7, 2012.Tea Party Candidates in NevedaNevada will elect their new crop of Tea Party candidates on June 12, 2012 in the Neveda primary.Tea Party Candidates in MinnesotaMinnesota will elect tea party candidates on August 14, 2012 in the Minnesota primary.Tea Party Candidates in New YorkNew York will elect their tea party candidates in the New York Republican primary.Stop Patriot Act Extension - Intrusion into our Private LivesThe USA PATRIOT ActThe USA PATRIOT Act broadly expands law enforcement's surveillance and investigative powers and represents one of the most significant threats to civil liberties, privacy and democratic traditions in U.S. history. What is PATRIOT?The USA PATRIOT Act (officially the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act) was quickly developed as anti-terrorism legislation in response to the September 11, 2001 attacks. The large and complex law received little Congressional oversight and debate, and was signed into law by President Bush Oct. 26, 2001. PATRIOT gives sweeping search and surveillance to domestic law enforcement and foreign intelligence agencies and eliminates checks and balances that previously gave courts the opportunity to ensure that those powers were not abused. PATRIOT and follow-up legislation now in development threaten the basic rights of millions of Americans. What should I do?Tell Congress to protect Americans' privacy and free speech rights. Learn More
Does The Patriot Act Trump The Constitution? - Bob BarrTwo days ago, I testified before a subcommittee of the House of Representatives Judiciary Committee. The topic was the USA PATRIOT Act; and specifically, provisions of the law set to expire at the end of this month. The most problematic of these provisions allows the government to gain access to a person’s private records and other “things,” in the hands of a third party, if sought for an investigation involving terrorism or foreign intelligence. This would include, for example, a person’s medical records, financial records, school records, business records, travel records, etc.Currently, under the PATRIOT Act, the government can access this private information or other items, without any showing whatsoever that there is a suspicion (much less, “probable cause”) that the person whose privacy the government seeks to violate, has committed any offense or is associated in any way with a suspected terrorist or even an associate of a known or suspected terrorist. Among the other powers that will be sun-setted unless Congress re-authorizes them, is the ability currently enjoyed by the government to secure so-called “roving” wiretaps on phones without even having to provide either the name of the person to be electronically surveilled or the precise location of the phone(s) to be tapped. Such “John Doe” roving wiretaps could subject entirely innocent third parties to having their phone(s) surveilled. My testimony was essentially to either: (1) permit the three sun-setted provisions to expire because they are not essential to the government’s ability to investigate, uncover and prosecute allegations of terrorist activity; or (2) at least limit them to bring them into accord with the Constitution. This would mean simply requiring the government to show minimal evidence that there is at least some suspected link between the person against whom the government is seeking to access private information, and suspected unlawful activity or association with a terrorist or terrorist organization (or a suspected such person or organization). Predictably, the Republican members on the subcommittee present at the hearing indicated no willingness whatsoever to place any limitations at all on these expansive and, I believe, unconstitutional provisions of the PATRIOT Act, that permit the government to violate a citizen’s privacy and gain access to possibly their most private of records, by doing nothing more than telling a judge that the government needs the information because it is “relevant” to some investigation. Many Members of Congress talk a good game of supporting civil liberties, our right to privacy, and the Constitution itself; but they are more than willing to allow those liberties to be trumped in the name of “fighting terrorism.” To them, there is a footnote to the Constitution and the Bill of Rights that says those limitations on government power do not apply if the government says it is “fighting terrorism.”
It is funny though – no copy of the Constitution I have been able to find includes such a footnote.
Bill of Rights - Us Constitution Amendment IV: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
US Patriot Act - Abolishes Your Freedom from unreasonable searches:
How PATRIOT Threatens Online Civil LibertiesUnder PATRIOT, civil liberties, especially privacy rights, have taken a severe blow:
Tea Party Candidates for President Tea Party Candidates Tea Party Patriot Candidates Tea Party Candidates Ideas Tea Party Candidates 2012 Tea Party Candidates Platform Tea Party Candidates Movement The Tea Party Platform Tea Party Ideas for Candidates
|
Private Search Engine Startpage Web SearchWhen you search with Startpage, we remove all identifying information from your query and submit it anonymously to Google ourselves. We get the results and ... www.startpage.com/http://www.startpage.com/ Political Bumper Stickers For volume printing of political decals. It does not matter if you are walking, driving around, or riding on the bus or car. You are bound to run into cars with all sorts of bumper stickers. One could ask: Why do people apply bumper stickers to their cars? There is no one absolute. Car Bumper Stickers Second Front Page Conservative
Proposed Conservative Laws for Alabama
Thank you for visiting our site, please return for updates. Please come back for updates.Conservative - Home Page | ||||